Both have a staunch following, and both perform exceptionally well. I really dislike this part of doing optics reviews. https://www.joeboboutfitters.com/War...-msr-mount.htm, MISC Training Course Announcements & AAR's, Former Vickers Shooting Method Regional Instructors, Pacific Northwest Training and Networking, All Other Longgun Parts, Accessories, & Magazines (EE), Handgun Parts, Accessories & Magazines (EE), If this is your first visit, be sure to I have the razor. Decided to test the long range waters and am looking at both of these scopes, but for the life of me I can't see why the Razor seems to be the preferred model. As such, there is no other way to look at this; the NF wins hands down on weight. That’s good enough for me. It’s perfectly adequate, and adjustable via a large knob on the left side of the scope body. I also spend many hours a week looking through it so I wanted the best glass I could find. How can I tell the difference between a PST Gen 1 and Gen II scope? No real surprises here, it has a great eyebox and simple layout that lends itself well to practical shooting. Then I saw the new Razor LHT that peeked my interest. That being said, the internals on a scope are a mechanical device and, ultimately, moving parts can fail. Source: own a Razor gen 2. On certain scopes, the zero stop mimics the higher end Razor HD Gen II, and the glass in all models is an improvement over the first generation. Vortex got really close to the Razor HD II with the PST II, and impressively so.

It’s not a huge difference, but it is an improvement in adjustment range. Compare that to the PST Gen II 5-25×50 FFP model with a FOV range of 24.1 ft to 4.8 ft at 100 yards. New advances in optics technology have exploded on the scene in recent years, and allow shooters to gain access to 1x red-dot-like performance yet still have enough magnification to really get some actual range out of semi-auto 556 NATO and 308 Winchester carbines. The field of view on the Razor is slightly larger than that on the F1, and this is actually a useful feature to have when gauging different shots. Let’s take a look at both of them and decide which one is the better scope. I have owned a VX5 HD and sold it, as I was going to replace it with a different reticle VX5. Larger tube typically means more adjustment which is great for long range. I'm sure I'll have more questions as i go along. Press J to jump to the feed. Short answer: Probably. Let us know if you have any other questions! Since this is a MOAR reticle in FFP, you don’t need any corrections, and on occasions when I needed to dial back from a better FOV (15x-18x), the FFP delivers excellent results without having to figure correction values for different magnifications. The MOAR reticle comes with a floating center crosshair, and bold 3, 6 and 9 o’clock posts, as well as an elevation scale that extends to the edge of the field of view. A little late to the party here, but the biggest difference you are going to see is in the optical quality. This was one of my biggest curiosities with this optic: Would the reticle be bright enough for daytime use?

The PST Gen 2 series scopes feature a wider field of view (commonly seen as FOV) compared to the Gen 1 scopes. If you want the best glass between the two series, then the Gen II scopes are definitely more your speed. Obviously I'm missing something here? The box for the Gen 1 models is only marked as “PST”. Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 TMCQ Riflescope PST-14ST-M, Vortex Optics Viper PST 1-4x24 SFP Riflescope - Tactical Turrets - TMCQ MRAD Reticle, Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 Riflescope with TMCQ MOA Reticles, Black, PST-14ST-A, Vortex Viper PST 4-16x50 EBR-1 Riflescope PST-416F1-M, Vortex Viper PST 4-16x50 Illum EBR-1 MRAD FFP Scope | PST-416F1-M | Ships Free, Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 4-16x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-1 Reticle (MRAD), Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 6-24x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-1 Reticle (MRAD), Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 6-24x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-2C MRAD Reticle, Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 6-24x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-1 Reticle (MOA), Comparison of the Vortex Crossfire II Scopes vs Vortex Diamondback Scopes. How Many Bodies Have Been Found In Tempe Town Lake, Arnold Stang Cause Of Death, Nightjar Patronus Analysis, Gevalia Kaffe Mug, Allison Holker Ex Fiancé Fowler, Signs He Feels Guilty For Hurting You, Concrete Slab Load Capacity Calculator, Scrooged Original Script, Derek Mckinnon Wiki, Hydrostatic Equilibrium Simple Definition, Russian Dried Fish, Dirt Car Racing Pictures, Toshi Shioya Cause Of Death, Rik Smits Daughter, Joy Harjo Equinox Analysis, Nepali Song Mp3, Choi Woo Shik Military Enlistment, Barbri Wills And Trusts Outline, Cissy Strut Meaning, Snap Dogg Age, Satisfactory Coal Generator Layout, Nombres Relacionados Con El Fuego, Mini Golf At Home, Drudge Of Society, En Otra Piel, Why Was Superjail Cancelled, Jayson Tatum Family, Barnwood Builders Cost To Build, Panhead Choppers For Sale, Crashlands Bawg Quests, A Compound That Treats A Damaging Tree Virus, Difficult Tongue Twisters In Malayalam, What's Worth A Queen Bee In Adopt Me, Best Mid Game Sword Hypixel Skyblock, Illinois Imba Video Essay, Logitech Slim Combo Bluetooth Pairing, Gear S3 Stress Widget, How To Turn Off Ice Maker Frigidaire Gallery, Grace Kelly Old, The Racial Contract Essay, Hey Just Thinking About You Text, Wool Paper For Mask Making, Razor Car Nfs, Wow Gutterspeak Translator, Tamiops Squirrel Care, Tim Meadows Wedding, Louise Stratton Today, What Is Ty Panitz Doing Now, Barium Ion Symbol, Andris Nelsons Salary, Mr Soul Singer, " />

If you’re going to be doing range-only work on a less-than-weekly basis, the PST II is more than fine.

They managed to take an already popular line, the PST series, give it a significant upgrade in the theme of their high-end products, and bring it to market without too much of a price increase. It’s hard to quantify the difference. Have the Vortex Diamondback HP Scopes Been Discontinued?

It’s fully transferable, there are no warranty cards to fool around with, and you don’t need to keep the receipt. From 2015, Vortex has shaken the market, and their Vortex Razor HD Gen II 4.5-27×56 grew by 80% in user preference. How much better? It’s something I would consider a must-have. I’m a fan. It looks good and it does things better than the PST, but in the end, there's a good chance that it will never let you do something you couldn't do with the PST almost just the same. Both devices provide excellent performance; I have to say that the Razor surprised me since I did not expect a Vortex to prove as equal in performance as an NF, but it did, so this is a tie.

Like I mentioned earlier, I was able to deer hunt from a stand right up until the season closed, but unfortunately didn’t see anything to shoot. I’ve said it before, but with good glass, when shooting on steel targets within the capabilities of an AR-15, misses are 99% of the time not because you have “bad glass.” Even cheap glass these days is good enough to see your target and get repeatable hits. Let’s take a look at the scope and its features without comparing it. That's the PST Gen II and the Razor HD II. If the Razord HD II is in your budget, it provides a lot more scope for its price than even scopes more expensive than it. The razor has a huge difference in glass quality. The adjustment mechanisms on the F1 are beyond reproach, and they are smooth, accurate and precise. The 2nd generation of the PST scopes were built based on feedback from the Gen 1 owners, new design features, and overall improvements. I’ve had good fortune with the optics I’ve been looking at lately, and this one is no exception. The quality of everything is substantially higher save for the mechanical stuff which I have not evaluated yet. What Rifle Scope Magnification Should I Get? To quote Vortex, from the other site, "The PST Gen II 1-6x is 85-90% the Razor HD Gen II E for 50% the money." At the very center, the VMR-2 reticle features a bright red dot. Have the Nikon M 308 Scopes Been Discontinued? I’m not sure how much of this was due to my frozen fingers trying to work the very short, somewhat sharp turret gripping surfaces, but I thought I’d mention it just the same. This system is more of a traditional, mechanical zero stop where the turret actually stops at the zero mark and can be adjusted back to zero without looking at the turret. Both are intergrated mechanical zero stops and both work well - L Tec is just quicker to use. It’s a scope I have some time on, and I think that most people are wondering how the PST II measures up to it anyway. I’m shopping for a Vortex Viper PST Gen 3 scope but can’t seem to locate one?

Both have a staunch following, and both perform exceptionally well. I really dislike this part of doing optics reviews. https://www.joeboboutfitters.com/War...-msr-mount.htm, MISC Training Course Announcements & AAR's, Former Vickers Shooting Method Regional Instructors, Pacific Northwest Training and Networking, All Other Longgun Parts, Accessories, & Magazines (EE), Handgun Parts, Accessories & Magazines (EE), If this is your first visit, be sure to I have the razor. Decided to test the long range waters and am looking at both of these scopes, but for the life of me I can't see why the Razor seems to be the preferred model. As such, there is no other way to look at this; the NF wins hands down on weight. That’s good enough for me. It’s perfectly adequate, and adjustable via a large knob on the left side of the scope body. I also spend many hours a week looking through it so I wanted the best glass I could find. How can I tell the difference between a PST Gen 1 and Gen II scope? No real surprises here, it has a great eyebox and simple layout that lends itself well to practical shooting. Then I saw the new Razor LHT that peeked my interest. That being said, the internals on a scope are a mechanical device and, ultimately, moving parts can fail. Source: own a Razor gen 2. On certain scopes, the zero stop mimics the higher end Razor HD Gen II, and the glass in all models is an improvement over the first generation. Vortex got really close to the Razor HD II with the PST II, and impressively so.

It’s not a huge difference, but it is an improvement in adjustment range. Compare that to the PST Gen II 5-25×50 FFP model with a FOV range of 24.1 ft to 4.8 ft at 100 yards. New advances in optics technology have exploded on the scene in recent years, and allow shooters to gain access to 1x red-dot-like performance yet still have enough magnification to really get some actual range out of semi-auto 556 NATO and 308 Winchester carbines. The field of view on the Razor is slightly larger than that on the F1, and this is actually a useful feature to have when gauging different shots. Let’s take a look at both of them and decide which one is the better scope. I have owned a VX5 HD and sold it, as I was going to replace it with a different reticle VX5. Larger tube typically means more adjustment which is great for long range. I'm sure I'll have more questions as i go along. Press J to jump to the feed. Short answer: Probably. Let us know if you have any other questions! Since this is a MOAR reticle in FFP, you don’t need any corrections, and on occasions when I needed to dial back from a better FOV (15x-18x), the FFP delivers excellent results without having to figure correction values for different magnifications. The MOAR reticle comes with a floating center crosshair, and bold 3, 6 and 9 o’clock posts, as well as an elevation scale that extends to the edge of the field of view. A little late to the party here, but the biggest difference you are going to see is in the optical quality. This was one of my biggest curiosities with this optic: Would the reticle be bright enough for daytime use?

The PST Gen 2 series scopes feature a wider field of view (commonly seen as FOV) compared to the Gen 1 scopes. If you want the best glass between the two series, then the Gen II scopes are definitely more your speed. Obviously I'm missing something here? The box for the Gen 1 models is only marked as “PST”. Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 TMCQ Riflescope PST-14ST-M, Vortex Optics Viper PST 1-4x24 SFP Riflescope - Tactical Turrets - TMCQ MRAD Reticle, Vortex Viper PST 1-4x24 Riflescope with TMCQ MOA Reticles, Black, PST-14ST-A, Vortex Viper PST 4-16x50 EBR-1 Riflescope PST-416F1-M, Vortex Viper PST 4-16x50 Illum EBR-1 MRAD FFP Scope | PST-416F1-M | Ships Free, Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 4-16x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-1 Reticle (MRAD), Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 6-24x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-1 Reticle (MRAD), Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 6-24x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-2C MRAD Reticle, Vortex Optics Viper PST Gen I 6-24x50 FFP Riflescope - EBR-1 Reticle (MOA), Comparison of the Vortex Crossfire II Scopes vs Vortex Diamondback Scopes.

How Many Bodies Have Been Found In Tempe Town Lake, Arnold Stang Cause Of Death, Nightjar Patronus Analysis, Gevalia Kaffe Mug, Allison Holker Ex Fiancé Fowler, Signs He Feels Guilty For Hurting You, Concrete Slab Load Capacity Calculator, Scrooged Original Script, Derek Mckinnon Wiki, Hydrostatic Equilibrium Simple Definition, Russian Dried Fish, Dirt Car Racing Pictures, Toshi Shioya Cause Of Death, Rik Smits Daughter, Joy Harjo Equinox Analysis, Nepali Song Mp3, Choi Woo Shik Military Enlistment, Barbri Wills And Trusts Outline, Cissy Strut Meaning, Snap Dogg Age, Satisfactory Coal Generator Layout, Nombres Relacionados Con El Fuego, Mini Golf At Home, Drudge Of Society, En Otra Piel, Why Was Superjail Cancelled, Jayson Tatum Family, Barnwood Builders Cost To Build, Panhead Choppers For Sale, Crashlands Bawg Quests, A Compound That Treats A Damaging Tree Virus, Difficult Tongue Twisters In Malayalam, What's Worth A Queen Bee In Adopt Me, Best Mid Game Sword Hypixel Skyblock, Illinois Imba Video Essay, Logitech Slim Combo Bluetooth Pairing, Gear S3 Stress Widget, How To Turn Off Ice Maker Frigidaire Gallery, Grace Kelly Old, The Racial Contract Essay, Hey Just Thinking About You Text, Wool Paper For Mask Making, Razor Car Nfs, Wow Gutterspeak Translator, Tamiops Squirrel Care, Tim Meadows Wedding, Louise Stratton Today, What Is Ty Panitz Doing Now, Barium Ion Symbol, Andris Nelsons Salary, Mr Soul Singer,